Comments on: Nuclear fuels http://www.biofuelswatch.com/nuclear-fuels/ Biofuels, bioenergy Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:27:07 +0100 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Dschulze66 http://www.biofuelswatch.com/nuclear-fuels/comment-page-1/#comment-1164 Dschulze66 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:10:09 +0000 http://www.biofuelswatch.com/?p=497#comment-1164 I think that we should find a way to produce energy without sending pollution into the enviorment. with nuclear power we would be putting U-238 which is the radio actice bi-product of nuclei in a nuclear fuel-cell. even though we have storage units they can be robbed fill fast or even be a target for terrorists. There are many other and very safer ways to produce energy,like the bloombox or solar or hydroelectric or geotheremal energy atomic energy is to dangerous. I think that we should find a way to produce energy without sending pollution into the enviorment. with nuclear power we would be putting U-238 which is the radio actice bi-product of nuclei in a nuclear fuel-cell. even though we have storage units they can be robbed fill fast or even be a target for terrorists. There are many other and very safer ways to produce energy,like the bloombox or solar or hydroelectric or geotheremal energy atomic energy is to dangerous.

]]> By: Jfarmer9 http://www.biofuelswatch.com/nuclear-fuels/comment-page-1/#comment-350 Jfarmer9 Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:57:22 +0000 http://www.biofuelswatch.com/?p=497#comment-350 I can't see who wrote this article but I thought it was very nice. I love how science can cut through anti-nuke’s diatribe and reveal it for the fear and lies that it is. 500 new nuke plants now, Jfarmer9 I can’t see who wrote this article but I thought it was very nice. I love how science can cut through anti-nuke’s diatribe and reveal it for the fear and lies that it is.

500 new nuke plants now,

Jfarmer9

]]>